- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:17:17 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13452 --- Comment #5 from Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net> 2011-08-02 14:17:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Rationale: There's a whole section on itemid="". I don't understand the problem > here. It is not about redefining itemid but about clarifying the role. Your statement for closing is true but completely orthogonal to what was suggested. > I can't tell you what it means, it's entirely up to the vocabulary. This is unrelated to the issue explained here. > It's > like asking what id="" means. It's just a global identifier. We all agree on that. Not the issue. The proposed text are about giving information on how itemid are used in the context of microdata. There is also still a false statement in the current specification. "The exact meaning of a global identifier is determined by the vocabulary's specification." something along "the specific types of uris usable as a global identifier is determined by the vocabulary's specification." would be correct. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 14:17:22 UTC