- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:25:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13467 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-08-02 07:25:25 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: It turns out that in practice regular authors have no problem with the verbosity here. It's only us geeks who get offended by it. (I was really surprised by this when I saw it in the lab. I had originally done the reverse-DNS thing to address this problem, as I think it does it quite neatly, but it turned out to be quite unnecessary.) In practice this will be a non-issue. The only place you will regularly see URLs is the itemtype="", but those can be made short by vocabulary authors if that is desired, and they will be relatively rare anyway (at least compared to the number of other URLs in Web documents). Properties will almost always be short names, either when using common vocabularies, or when using untyped vocabularies for personal adhoc use. The use of URL property names is expected to be a rarity and is only there to enable extensions. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 07:25:27 UTC