- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:36:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12267 --- Comment #45 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-08-01 21:36:19 UTC --- Preventing the video from playing until the events have been processed seems like building latency into the design. Event dispatch can sometimes be delayed quite a lot, e.g. if there's a lot of activity going on. Are we sure we want to be introducing this kind of latency? The spec does currently delay a number of transitions until stable states (i.e. til the end of the current event loop task), e.g. .seeking only changes in this way, and most networkState transitions are done in stable states. I could go through the spec and see if there's any other transitions that could be made more stable. I don't know that readyStates would make sense done this way though. There's no point readyState saying there's FUTURE_DATA when the video has actually ended. Similarly, it's not like you can actually prevent the video from ending before it's ended. The video ends when you run out of material, regardless of how busy the browser is. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 21:36:21 UTC