W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10642] No alternative text description for video key frame (poster)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:05:11 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P1PNP-0007Ng-4q@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #24 from Ashley Ward <ash@netality.com> 2010-09-30 20:05:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> I think it's wrong to assume that explicitly added poster attribute implies
> poster frame explicitly chosen by the author. Video hosting sites and markup
> authoring tools may add poster frame automatically (as a performance
> optimisation). This seems to be standard practice in current Flash players.
> BTW: is this discussion appropriate for the bug comments? Perhaps it should be
> taken to the mailinglist?

Okay, it's a fair point that many poster frames may be added automatically and
so the presence of an explicit poster attribute does not directly imply that
it's been chosen by the author. However, that's no reason to not have an
ability to supply alternative text for it. That's a bit like saying that images
shouldn't have an alt attribute because some images may be server generated.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 20:05:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:26 UTC