- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:51:42 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10862 --- Comment #2 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-09-30 15:51:42 UTC --- Correction: Remove the newly re-added element, that was originally deprecated in HTML 4. At least strike had a meaningful name. So why restore the deprecated element, but remove the non-deprecated element that supposedly has the same meaning? There is a level of arbitrariness to this that is disturbing. Almost a level of frivolity, as displayed in this comment: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9429#c12 This was an incredibly inconsistent and illogical decision -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 15:51:44 UTC