- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:08:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10849 --- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-09-30 15:08:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why is @alt insufficient for this task? With @alt you can express the type of > the image when appropriate *and* more information as well. > Further, I don't understand the semantics of multiple keywords in your > proposal. Take "photograph painting". Is it a photograph of a painting? A > painting of a photograph? A painting and a photograph together in one image? you can't use alt to provide an unambiguous categorisation of an image content type can you? alt allows any words/numbers etc what i have suggested only allows predefined kyewords. the idea behind allowing multiple keywords is authors to specify with more granularity the img content so "photograph painting" indicates its a photgraph of a painting. the order of the keywords indicates specificity. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 15:08:25 UTC