W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10642] No alternative text description for video key frame (poster)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:38:18 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P1Fak-0000QR-6H@jessica.w3.org>

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |mjs@apple.com

--- Comment #5 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2010-09-30 09:38:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > So presumably the title of the video would be sufficient?
> > 
> > If so, surely you'd want this regardless of whether a poster image has been
> > explicitly provided or not, right?
> No.  You presume incorrectly.  The title of the video, is different than the
> alternative text for the post.
> Title should always be required
> Poster alt should be required whenever a poster has been explicitly set.
> Title: 2010 Marathon Coverage
> Poster alt: Sally Smith crossing the finish line with her hands upraised.

What if poster isn't explicitly set, but that's what the default poster (either
the first frame of the video or set inside the media file) shows the same thing
as what you describe in your example?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 09:38:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:25 UTC