W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10411] Why are all the RFCs referenced in .txt versions? The HTML versions are more convenient (and it's silly for HTML to avoid the HTML versions!).

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:10:18 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P12yo-0004R0-GG@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10411

--- Comment #5 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2010-09-29 20:10:18 UTC ---
That RFC is a bad example for why the HTML format is better.  Here's a better
one:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321

It has a table of contents with hyperlinks so you can jump directly to the
section you want, and there are lots of hyperlinks to sections and other RFCs
that would be a much bigger pain to follow in the text version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:10:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:25 UTC