- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:29:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9590 Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonas@sicking.cc --- Comment #11 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2010-09-29 05:29:07 UTC --- I'm not a huge fan of the x-vendor-function syntax, but if that's what everyone else prefers then I can live with it. However a few other alternatives to consider are: vendor_function_vendor_function vendor__function vendor-function- I think out of these I like the first one the most, though I guess the concern is that other specs might use that syntax and eventually we might want to bring those specs into HTML, a'la SVG? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 05:29:10 UTC