- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:32:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10255 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-28 19:32:48 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: If it applied to <div> you'd be unable to wrap your <article>'s <address> in a <div> for styling purposes, which would be bad. I really don't see why applying it to <article> is a bad thing. That's exactly what <article> is for. In a discussion medium such as this bug database, each comment should absolutely be an <article>. That's what <article> is explicitly intended to be for. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 19:32:50 UTC