- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:20:40 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10318 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |NEEDSINFO --- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-28 18:20:39 UTC --- If pubdate was the only value, I think we'd drop this altogether. The main value is machine-readable dates that don't require natural-language processing. I would like to make sure we expose the attribute somehow, so that it's not hidden metadata. At the end of the day, I'll spec whatever gets implemented. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: What will browser vendors implement? Convince them to do what you want and that's what the spec will say. In the meantime, I don't want to keep flip-flopping on this so I've left it as is. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 18:20:42 UTC