- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:13:06 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10606 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-28 05:13:06 UTC --- Please only file one issue per bug. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please open a new bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Problem 1: I don't see why authors would think alt=" " was equivalent to alt="". The spec is clear about the meaning of "empty" and this kind of distinction is all over the platform. Pretty much the only place where they _are_ the same is inter-element whitespace. Problem 2: If people don't trust the spec, we can't fix the problem by adding yet more text to the spec. Problem 3: I do not buy the premise that any authors would even think about this. If you disagree with any of these please file a new bug specifically for that issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 05:13:09 UTC