W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10411] Why are all the RFCs referenced in .txt versions? The HTML versions are more convenient (and it's silly for HTML to avoid the HTML versions!).

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:14:12 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Ozq7Q-0007Xb-1Z@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10411


Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|NEEDSINFO                   |




--- Comment #3 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com>  2010-09-26 12:14:11 ---
I don't know if these versions are "canonical", but they seem a lot nicer than
the text versions (using coloring and some auto-hyperlinks), and they're hosted
at ietf.org:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1345

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 12:14:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:25 UTC