- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:16:32 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9876 --- Comment #8 from James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> 2010-09-26 11:16:32 --- So I think the original point here was that <figure> provides a means to group an image and a caption together. There is no point in limiting the scope to only cases where the <figure> is not the primary content in the page because such a limitation will be ignored in practice. It is also not clear what value it would bring and, in some cases would be downright odd. For example consider a scientific article that provides captioned <figure>s in the main article, but where each image links to a page displaying only the image+caption, but at a larger size. Requiring that authors use different markup for the same content in these two situations seems perverse. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 11:16:34 UTC