- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:22:44 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10551 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-26 02:22:44 --- Same problem occurs for any of the special elements, e.g. <option><div><option>, and has since long before r5032. The problem is that </option> is too "weak". Really to make this work as specced, we'd need <option> to be a special category element. I've changed <option> to not imply </option> unless the current node is <option>, which seems less drastic and equally useful from an authoring perspective. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: having an implied element get ignored is poor form -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 02:22:46 UTC