W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10741] New: align @extension with @vendor--feature (Rob Ennals's ISSUE-41 prop)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:37:20 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10741-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: align @extension with @vendor--feature (Rob Ennals's
                    ISSUE-41 prop)
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
               URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/infrastructure#extensibil
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,

Rob Ennals's Change Proposal suggests that foreign namespaces not officially
part of HTML5, must have an @extension attribute:

    <my-root-element  xmlns="http://my-name-space/"  extension="extension" >

However, in light of the @vendor--feature construct (or @_vendor-feature, bug
9590 is still open), it seems reasonable to let the @extension attribute follow
the same shape. E.g. instead of @extension one could use @xml--ns

    <my-root-element  xmlns="http://my-name-space/"  xml--ns="xml--ns"  >

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 00:37:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:25 UTC