- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:20:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10244 --- Comment #8 from Anne <annevk@opera.com> 2010-09-24 16:20:40 --- So I agree this is not an ideal situation. The distinction I meant to draw in the Mozilla bug was between what HTML5 requires of the CSS Ruby Module and what http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/ requires of the CSS Ruby Module. Because if we really want the latter we will need changes to HTML5 -- for the other elements -- and we have to see whether everyone is on board with that. (I would prefer it if everyone had the simple version to start with and then we go from there.) Now unrelated to whether of those two paths we pick, the CSS Ruby Module will need to be updated to handle unexpected situations. (Much like we have done to some extent with CSS tables.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 16:20:42 UTC