W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 9799] Syntax of <ol@type> and <ul@type> should be aligned with CSS list-style-type

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:59:55 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Oz9kh-0000mN-99@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9799


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |LATER




--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-09-24 14:59:55 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: I looked into this but on balance I think we're better off not doing
this (yet). I'm loathe to introduce synonyms, so for <ol type> I'm skeptical
about doing it at all. For <ul type> the only addition at this point would be
"none" and I don't see the use of that. Maybe once CSS3 Lists is more complete,
we can revisit this, though.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 14:59:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:24 UTC