- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:10:47 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10646 Summary: Home page is not general-public-friendly Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML WG website AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2010Sep/0013.html (Copied below) I'd just like to draw attention to some posts by Shelley providing support for commenting on the specs: http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification http://realtech.burningbird.net/how-comment-and-when http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification/html5-document-structure I think these are really good and helpful, esp. for people new to the spec and the W3C. One thing I notice about the HTMLWG's home page: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ is that it's *not* particularly friendly to such an audience (it's a more typical working WG page; there's not even a list of links to tutorials, or to these wikipedia pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML5) something akin to the latter will be invaluable). Given the wide and diverse reviewers expected and desired for last call, I think it would be very good to have a more friendly entry point. I know there are other sources of friendliness, so I don't think it necessarily requires a huge chunk of work on the WG's part. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 16:10:55 UTC