- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:10:47 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10646
Summary: Home page is not general-public-friendly
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML WG website
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com,
rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2010Sep/0013.html
(Copied below)
I'd just like to draw attention to some posts by Shelley providing
support for commenting on the specs:
http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification
http://realtech.burningbird.net/how-comment-and-when
http://realtech.burningbird.net/reviewcomment-w3c-html5-specification/html5-document-structure
I think these are really good and helpful, esp. for people new to the
spec and the W3C. One thing I notice about the HTMLWG's home page:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/
is that it's *not* particularly friendly to such an audience (it's a
more typical working WG page; there's not even a list of links to
tutorials, or to these wikipedia pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML5)
something akin to the latter will be invaluable).
Given the wide and diverse reviewers expected and desired for last
call, I think it would be very good to have a more friendly entry
point. I know there are other sources of friendliness, so I don't
think it necessarily requires a huge chunk of work on the WG's part.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 16:10:55 UTC