- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:04:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10618
Summary: Use "unmapped" rather than "no role" in the
weak/strong ARIA tables
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/content-models.html#table
-aria-strong
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: a11y
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Blocks: 10066
In ARIA 1.0 draft, role="presentation" is as synonym for "no role": [*]
]] the presentation role causes a given element to be treated as having no
role
[ snip ]
<!-- 2. There is no implicit role for span, so only the contents are exposed.
-->
<span> Sample Content </span>
<!-- 3. This role declaration is redundant. -->
<span role="presentation"> Sample Content </span> [[
[*] http://www.w3.org/WAI.new/PF/aria/complete#presentation
However, looking at the weak and strong ARIA tables [*][#], (and also, having
followed your justifications in the bugs), it is clear that "no role" in those
tables are used in another meaning of the word, namely to indicate that ARIA
does not have a fitting role to offer.
[*] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/content-models#table-aria-weak
[#] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/content-models#table-aria-strong
To have no role is, in ARIA's terminology, equal to be a <span> element or
perhaps a <div>. Thus, in order to avoid misunderstanding and mixing of
concepts, consider using another wording. My proposal is "unmapped" or
"unmappable".
Note that it is not possible to say "presentation", as "presentation" is used
in order to negate an implicit role: ]] An element whose implicit native role
semantics will not be mapped to the accessibility API. [[
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 02:04:51 UTC