- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:21:14 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9428 Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shadow2531@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com> 2010-09-12 16:21:13 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Reply to comment #1 From Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-04-13 01:10:14 ------- > >> * there are some plug-ins that can be used without either @data or @type (they > >> use <param> instead. > > > >Which ones? How does the UA know which plugin to start? > > Webkit seems to be able to use <param> instead of @type and/or @data. And Opera > has a very agressive attitude - it works with almost anything, last I checked. With <object>, Opera invents @data in many situations for compatibility (especially for pages where Opera ends up getting IE-only code/markup because of bad browser detection). For example: <object> <param name="filename" value="file.wmv"> </object> becomes: <object data="file.wmv"> <param name="filename" value="file.wmv"> </object> Opera does all kinds of magic with <object>. However, that doesn't seem to be necessary for all browsers, just Opera right now with its market share and it be lucky enough to be hit by bad browser detection. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 12 September 2010 16:21:15 UTC