- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:54:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10481 --- Comment #48 from Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> 2010-09-11 23:54:44 --- (In reply to comment #42) > > I'm sympathetic to Ian's concern to avoiding cluttering speech/text/braille > > renderings with irrelevant information, > > Which poses a larger questions: is this a solution in search of a problem? I don't think so. In my experience, screen reader users (for example) often mention "clutter" generally in webpages as a problem. Here's a few examples from public mailing lists: * http://www.mail-archive.com/jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com/msg18188.html * http://www.mail-archive.com/jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com/msg27293.html * http://www.mail-archive.com/blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com/msg13088.html ("graphics laden web sites") All things being equal, reduction of clutter is good. > Has this ever been reported as a problem? End-users seem highly unlikely to articulate concerns in terms of how elements are mapped to accessibility APIs, but JAWS's announcing of "graphic" sometimes comes up as a user annoyance, e.g.: * http://www.freelists.org/post/jfw/graphic [2006] * http://www.freelists.org/post/jfw/graphics (and thread) [2010] As a user, I personally think it's highly suboptimal if to consume a webpage I need to view UI images (e.g. icons) or even be notified of their existence. More generally, I think it's a real failure that a purportedly media independent, user-formattable markup language requires this. So it would be great if we could work out a way to discard such irrelevant information. But I suspect it's not safe to do this in the blanket manner suggested by Hixie, even though some implementations apparently do this (e.g. Safari+VoiceOver). Maybe there's some heuristics we could come up with (e.g. images that are links, buttons, headings versus content images), or maybe not. If not, I guess we need wider and better implementations of CSS3 Replaced Content (http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/) that expose the replaced text to accessibility APIs so that authors stop having to use "img" for safe-ish text replacement. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2010 23:54:48 UTC