- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:01:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10481 --- Comment #38 from Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> 2010-09-11 19:01:13 --- (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #36) > > > But, per the current draft, you do need to specify role="img" to images with a > > non-empty "alt" if you want them exposed as images to platform accessibility > > APIs. > > I cannot find this in the spec. Can you point out where this is specified? I guess it's specified by omission, in that no default role is specified for "img" with non-empty "alt", and given the editor closed this bug as WONTFIX, I guess that's a correct interpretation. The spec could be clearer on this point, for example by including "img" with non-empty "alt" in the list of "elements in HTML [that] have no default role and no restrictions on what roles can be applied to those elements". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2010 19:01:15 UTC