- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:52:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10481 --- Comment #27 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-09-10 12:52:40 --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > (In reply to comment #24) > > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > > Rationale: For most images, role=img is unsuitable, because the <img> doesn't > > > > > represent an image, but something else (e.g. text as part of a link). > > leif wrote: > > >an empty @alt means that an <img> is not represented as an image to AT users. > > > > currently that is not strictly true, an <img> is still mapped to accessibility > > APIs as an image, AT use the alt="" as flag to indicate the image should not be > > announced to users. > > > > In HTML5 alt="" is mapped to role="presentation" so AT will no longer be able > > to provide a choice to users as to whether they get an indication that an image > > is present or not. > So <img alt="" src="*"> as currently implemented maps to role="img", except > that isn't (by default) announced? in firefox and IE yes on windows . its not possible to check on the other browsers as they don't expose the accessibility API information well. In safari 5 on Mac OSX <img alt=""> is not exposed as an image. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 12:52:42 UTC