- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:59:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10481 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-09-08 08:59:18 --- (In reply to comment #1) > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are > satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If > you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please > reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML > Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest > title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue > yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: For most images, role=img is unsuitable, because the <img> doesn't > represent an image, but something else (e.g. text as part of a link). 2 questions: 1. Can you provide data to back that up? 2. does this mean that a user agent that maps an <img> to a role="img" by default is non conforming? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 08:59:20 UTC