- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:12:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-08 07:12:19 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Yeah, they're not used much and should probably not have been introduced. But I don't buy that they're going to cause any extra harm in the future, unlike, say, <abbr>, which was actively causing harm on an ongoing basis. IMHO removing these would just annoy people who use them (likely early adopters and people who care about HTML, exactly the people we _don't_ want to irritate), without actually measurably helping anyone else out. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 07:12:21 UTC