W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10212] Redundant? This is implied by the heading.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:54:01 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OtEXh-0007t2-C2@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10212


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
         Resolution|                            |NEEDSINFO




--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-09-08 06:54:00 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: I don't understand. Could you elaborate? What is implied?

Generally I try not to have any implication, it leads to people making the
wrong assumptions.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 06:54:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:24 UTC