- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:04:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10479 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #7 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-09-07 20:04:46 --- (In reply to comment #6) > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are > satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If > you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please > reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML > Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest > title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue > yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html > > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: If you changed the role of a <details> element, the user could no > longer expand the <details> element to get to its contents. That would be a net > loss of accessibility. If you have a group of radio buttons inside a <details> > and you need to wrap them with role=radiogroup, then you should use an element > for that group; <details> is not it. The following does not make sense, please explain why: > If you changed the role of a <details> element, the user could no > longer expand the <details> element to get to its contents. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 20:04:51 UTC