- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:54:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10556 Summary: Document tells people to register canvas context types at WhatWG Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac System 9.x Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: shelleyp@burningbird.net QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org The Canvas section in the document has a link to the WhatWG wiki in order to "register" new context types. The problem with this is that the WhatWG web site is a personal web site maintained by one person (Ian Hickson), owned by one person (Ian Hickson), with no formal structure, or guarantee of reliability. In fact, reliability of the web site has been a problem in the past, as it is based in Dreamhost, a host notorious for interruptions of service. Secondly, there is no mechanism in place to ensure the security of the data, nor to deal with conflicts if any arise. A wiki is no place on which to build a standard. Only a neophyte would consider a wiki a good place to order to register _anything_ so that all application builders can rely on what's registered. Lastly, the W3C document should not contain any link to WhatWG documents, because the WhatWG is not a formal organization, with legal structure, or patent policy in place. Without a formal organization backing the site, there is no guarantee that any links will continue point to any one document in the future -- for all we know, the WhatWG web site could be bought by spammers someday and the linked document then becomes a page of ads for herbal supplements. Even if the WhatWG domain remains, there is no guarantee that the sole owner of the web site won't change the contents of documents in such a way as to cause confusion or even disruption. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 6 September 2010 13:54:59 UTC