W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 7475] Semantics of rel=first and rel=index breaks specs and implementations

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:12:54 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Or9b4-0001RG-6K@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7475





--- Comment #12 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>  2010-09-02 13:12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> This would break with how these link types are specified elsehwere. I think
> this issue is ready for the tracker.

Suggested title of the Tracker issue: Do not break implemented link types

Suggested text of Tracker issue:  Some of the draft’s/the editor's proposed
re-definitions and re-canonicalizations  of some of the link types, will 'break
the Web' as they represent a break with how  these link relation keywords  are
generally implemented and/or specified. For a good overview over how existing
specs and implementations define or canonicalize link relations, see  Alexandre
Alapetite’s table. (Current link to his table:
http://alexandre.alapetite.fr/divers/vrac/20091115_HTML_link_rel.html )

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:12:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:23 UTC