- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:12:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7475 --- Comment #12 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2010-09-02 13:12:53 --- (In reply to comment #10) > This would break with how these link types are specified elsehwere. I think > this issue is ready for the tracker. Suggested title of the Tracker issue: Do not break implemented link types Suggested text of Tracker issue: Some of the draft’s/the editor's proposed re-definitions and re-canonicalizations of some of the link types, will 'break the Web' as they represent a break with how these link relation keywords are generally implemented and/or specified. For a good overview over how existing specs and implementations define or canonicalize link relations, see Alexandre Alapetite’s table. (Current link to his table: http://alexandre.alapetite.fr/divers/vrac/20091115_HTML_link_rel.html ) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:12:56 UTC