- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 02:32:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8989 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> 2010-05-05 02:32:01 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: Moved requirement from HTML5 spec, to HTML5 documents and conformance checkers: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100504/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6&f=h """ Since RDFa uses attributes starting with xmlns: to specify CURIE prefixes, any attribute starting with a case-insensitive match on the text string "xmlns:" must be preserved in the DOM or other tree-like model that is passed to the RDFa Processor. For documents conforming to this specification, attributes with names that have a case insensitive prefix matching "xmlns:" must be considered conforming. Conformance checkers must accept attribute names that have a case insensitive prefix matching "xmlns:" as conforming. """ Rationale: Conformance requirements should be on the document and on conformance checkers, not the HTML5 spec. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 02:32:03 UTC