[Bug 8985] Unclear if requirement to ensure namespace well-formed fragments is separate from other transformation requirements

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8985


Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #2 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>  2010-05-05 01:17:49 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Fixed

Change Description: 

Clarified that all that is required to ensure that XMLLiteral values are
namespace well-formed is to:

1. Run the "Coercing an HTML DOM into an Infoset" algorithm.
2. Run the "Serializing XHTML Fragments" algorithm.



"""
An RDFa Processor that transforms the XML fragment must use the Coercing an
HTML DOM into an Infoset algorithm, as specified in the HTML5 specification,
followed by the algorithm defined in the Serializing XHTML Fragments section of
the HTML5 specification. If an error or exception occurs at any point during
the transformation, the triple containing the XMLLiteral must not be generated.
"""

Rationale:

The language that was specified before was overly complicated. Replaced with
language that hopefully makes the point in a way that is more clear.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 01:17:51 UTC