- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 00:33:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9187 --- Comment #17 from Larry Masinter <lmm@acm.org> 2010-05-05 00:33:27 --- Someone who has not been tracking the HTML working group process day to day should be able to review which sections of the document for which there is widely perceived problem but for which the issue was closed because there was no concrete proposal delivered in time, especially since the timeouts have been produced without any clear reasoning for when the deadline was set or any consensus from the working group that the deadline was reasonable. This "bug" in the process will be fixed when at least 2 out of 3 random non-working group member would be able to tell that, say, the issue over the "resource vs. representation" issue was only closed because Roy Fielding wasn't willing to volunteer to work on the editing with a deadline to the chair's satisfaction. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 00:33:29 UTC