- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 06:54:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9649
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi
Resolution|INVALID |
--- Comment #2 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2010-05-04 06:53:59 ---
Given that DOMParser already exists on the XML side and we prefer XHR over
Document.load(), I'd like to see the rationale for introducing this new feature
instead of making DOMParser support text/html.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2010 06:54:01 UTC