- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 07:53:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9061
Steve Jorgensen <stevej@stevej.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stevej@stevej.name
--- Comment #6 from Steve Jorgensen <stevej@stevej.name> 2010-05-03 07:53:49 ---
I disagree with the rejection response. Just because there are many complex
cases to which image maps would be hard to apply does not mean there are not a
plethora of simple cases for which image maps would be extremely handy.
Using a mouse click to zoom in is a great example of where this would be handy.
Since browser-interoperable mouse position determination is so incredibly
complicated, an image map makes a nice, simple solution, especially where (as
is likely the case) the precision of the click position need not be extremely
precise.
The only potentially convincing counterargument I can think of to adding image
maps to canvas elements is that the same thing can be accomplished by
overlaying transparent, absolutely-positioned anchors. That is, however, a
very kludgey way to handle it, and does not trivially deal with non-rectangular
areas.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 07:53:52 UTC