- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 04:18:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670
Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #50 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> 2010-05-03 04:18:10 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected removal of CURIEs from RDFa Core 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1
Change Description:
Changes have been made in RDFa Core 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1 to enable CURIE-less
usage of RDFa. Full-IRIs in RDFa attributes:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/#s_curieprocessing
and RDFa Profiles:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/#s_profiles
are two of the mechanisms now available in RDFa Core 1.1 that don't require the
use of CURIEs.
Rationale:
Removal of CURIEs from RDFa Core 1.1 is not something that the RDFa WG is
willing to do, especially since there is broad deployment for CURIEs at the
moment. If you wish to pursue this further, please raise this as an ISSUE in
the HTML WG.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 04:18:13 UTC