- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 03:57:32 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8997
Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> 2010-05-03 03:57:32 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Fixed
Change Description:
Section 6, now section 4.5, has been changed to be normative:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#infoset-based-processors
Section 7, now section 4.6, has been changed to be normative:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#dom-level-2-based-processors
Rationale:
These two sections were informative because we don't want to specify
implementation details on how the values are extracted. The language is fairly
generic and only discusses the Infoset and DOM2 elements, not parser/processor
implementation details. Since there is a SHOULD level requirement, it may not
be as dangerous as it started out. Let's try this and see if anyone complains.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 03:57:34 UTC