- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:28:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10041
Summary: Document lacks discussion about ratinale for section
element
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van
Kesteren)
AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com
ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com
>>>> On what grounds was the addition of the section element made? what was
>>>> lacking in HTML4?
>>>
>>> That seems like something for this document:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Rationale
>>
>> To me, it seems like something that should be in this document. Also,
>> I'm not interested in the WHATWG HTML spec, I am interested in the W3C
>> HTML spec. It's already terribly confusing that there are two
>> versions, and the fact that the WHATWG version keeps growing outside
>> the scope of the W3C version might make the scope of the WHATWG
>> rationale larger than W3C HTML5.
>
> Lets cross that bridge when it becomes an actual problem.
It's a problem. I would like a working group decision then on this
matter and/or a formal response from the WG chair.
>>> Since you are asking the same question for all new elements I have
>>> omitted those questions from my reply.
>>
>> For each, the questions still apply.
>
Again, I would like a working group decision on this matter and/or a
formal response from the WG chair.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:28:57 UTC