- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:23:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10038 Summary: Document should state that parsing is based on IE6 and possibly other UAs Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van Kesteren) AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com >>>> for this syntax which are largely compatible with popular >>>>> implementations. >>>> >>>> Please reference the implementations on which the parsing is based. >>>> And please explain why those implementations (be it browser or search >>>> engine) were chosen as the basis on which the parsing algorithm was >>>> based on. >>> >>> I don't think this is of relevance to this document, but it would sure >>> be interesting. >> >> I disagree. It's common knowledge that parsing is mostly based on IE6. >> I don't see the problem with mentioning IE6 there. >> >> If the common knowledge is wrong, then this is the document that has >> to set the record straight. > > As I explained before this document is not about explaining how HTML5 > design decisions were arrived at. I'm asking you to make a statement of fact, not to explain how the fact was derived. so you could say "this syntax which are largely compatible with popular implementations because it is largely based on Internet Explorer 6's behavior." It's important to document history here: without it, we are bound to make the same mistakes again. If other implementation played a role (e.g., the way Google's spiders process pages), then those should be documented too. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:23:02 UTC