- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:07:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10030 Summary: The WHATWG and its ratinale document has no standading Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van Kesteren) AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com On 6/23/10 10:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> Reading your comments I think you may actually be interested in a >>> difference effort: >>> >>> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Rationale >> >> That "effort" is pretty thin on content, manpower, authority and >> rationale - though I'm sure the intentions are good. Also, the >> rationale seems pretty self serving. If you find something useful in >> the Rationale, then perhaps you should fold it into this authoritative >> W3C document. > > a) You can help out, it's a wiki! b) Rationale should probably be a > separate document. It is rather different from this document. Look, even in the abstract of your document it says "provides some of the rationale for the changes." That Wiki has no official standing and it's not part of any legally recognized organization or consortium. I'm not going to go and add stuff to some random Wiki when there is a perfectly good document, which you are editing, from a reputable and internationally recognized institution: the W3C. If the WHATWG was to incorporate or become a real consortium or non-profit organization, then I'd be happy to submit my input there. However, until that time, the WHATWG has little credibility and I will continue to submit my comments here. Again, please provide the rationale for the differences between HTML4 and HTML5 in this document. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:07:17 UTC