- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:07:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10030
Summary: The WHATWG and its ratinale document has no standading
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van
Kesteren)
AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com
ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com
On 6/23/10 10:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> Reading your comments I think you may actually be interested in a
>>> difference effort:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Rationale
>>
>> That "effort" is pretty thin on content, manpower, authority and
>> rationale - though I'm sure the intentions are good. Also, the
>> rationale seems pretty self serving. If you find something useful in
>> the Rationale, then perhaps you should fold it into this authoritative
>> W3C document.
>
> a) You can help out, it's a wiki! b) Rationale should probably be a
> separate document. It is rather different from this document.
Look, even in the abstract of your document it says "provides some of
the rationale for the changes."
That Wiki has no official standing and it's not part of any legally
recognized organization or consortium. I'm not going to go and add stuff
to some random Wiki when there is a perfectly good document, which you
are editing, from a reputable and internationally recognized
institution: the W3C.
If the WHATWG was to incorporate or become a real consortium or
non-profit organization, then I'd be happy to submit my input there.
However, until that time, the WHATWG has little credibility and I will
continue to submit my comments here.
Again, please provide the rationale for the differences between HTML4
and HTML5 in this document.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:07:17 UTC