- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:11:26 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9887
David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |davidc@nag.co.uk
--- Comment #3 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2010-06-17 08:11:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Using annotation-xml to embed svg or html in mathml seems like an ugly hack,
> maybe we shouldn't support it at all and require use of <mn> et al instead.
I can not see why you call this a hack, this is the intended usage of the
element
It is far preferable to use a an mn with a number in it and then annotate it
with annotation-xml if necessary as that gives specified fallback for those
systems that do not understand each kind of annotation. The default display
for an annotation is to ignore it, so all a browser needs to do with
annotation-xml is not generate an error with it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2010 08:11:27 UTC