- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:08:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9894 --- Comment #2 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-06-10 13:08:20 --- One other thing, your statement: 'For example, in the case above, the working group decision could have been "the html specification should not include optional implementation advice", or "the html specification should not attempt to improve accessibility" or "the html specification should not acknowledge the possibility of authors making authoring mistakes", each of which would result in the paragraph being removed but would _also_ result in the spec being consistently updated so that it remained coherent.' Such broad outlines based on a simple decision to move one unnecessary and confusing paragraphs is ludicrous. In addition, you have demonstrated an inability to refrain from making damaging wholesale changes, as reaction to something you disagree with. If you can't understand how to edit the document based on group discussions than yes, you probably do need to resign. Or the group needs to add additional editors who are not encumbered by having these overly broad decision policies attached to even minor decisions. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 13:08:23 UTC