- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 03:46:08 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
Summary: HTML+RDFa 1.1 in @version could be confusing
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Macintosh
URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/#conformance
OS/Version: MacOS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny)
AssignedTo: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
ReportedBy: glsimpso@indiana.edu
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org,
msporny@digitalbazaar.com
Since HTML5 does not have a version specification and RDFa does, <html
version="HTML+RDFa 1.1" lang="en"> can be confusing with regard to
understanding what is actually being versioned here. It seems to be that it's
HTML (implied 5) plus RDFa 1.1 but without an explicitly stated HTML version
number, it looks like the it is 1.1 of something called HTML+RDFa.
My recommendation would be to add a version number to the HTML part of the
string: <html version="HTML5+RDFa 1.1" lang="en">
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 03:46:09 UTC