- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:19:06 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10255
Summary: The earlier version where it said "If an address
element applies to a section of a document, then it
represents contact information for that section only"
was a better approach. I see what you're after here,
but it's way too 1996. "A web page" or "a docu
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the
-address-element
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-address-element
Comment:
The earlier version where it said "If an address element applies to a section
of a document, then it represents contact information for that section only"
was a better approach. I see what you're after here, but it's way too 1996. "A
web page" or "a document" in 2010 terms is very, very often a composite
content stream with numeous sources with independent attribution (contact
info). This needs to work down to the div level. I would suggest that this
be
done with id attributes and some attribute of the address element that refers
to an id attribute (e.g. <div id="foo">...<address
scope="foo">...</address></div> Please re-examine this with a more "Web 2.0+"
view. - Stanton - gmail: smccandlish - please subscribe me to this bug (I'm
submitting this thru the floating mini-form at the bottom of
http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work)
Posted from: 68.35.93.63
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 06:19:07 UTC