- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:37:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10213
Summary: The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not
an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether
the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In
particular, using this definition for websockets means
that wss: urls with no forward slashes afte
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#abs
olute-url
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#absolute-url
Comment:
The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since
its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired?
In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with
no forward slashes after the ':' are treated as non-absolute, though in fact
they're treated as absolute by the browser in practice.
Posted from: 173.48.34.3
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 20:37:22 UTC