- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:52:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068 --- Comment #20 from Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> 2010-07-07 17:52:15 --- (In reply to comment #13) > HTML web developers have an obligation to ensure their applications respond > gracefully in all situations, including no JavaScript support, or even scripts > being stripped. The more such comments on this issue I am reading the more I think that noscript should not be deprecated. Such an "obligation" does not exist. Many customers or clients do not care much (if at all) about situations where JavaScript is not available and will not pay for time spent on preparing for such situations. And they also often do not even care if the HTML-code is valid. None of that will be changed by declaring noscript deprecated. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 17:52:17 UTC