- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:09:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068 --- Comment #12 from Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com> 2010-07-07 15:09:55 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Not only is progressive enhancement a much better technique for dealing with > cases where scripts are not supported in the client, it also caters for the > case where the browser does support scripting, but all scripts are removed by a > proxy server. This is bad craftsmanship too, such crude proxy servers ought to be handling noscript elements too. It is not the responsibility of the HTML author to anticipate and mitigate this scenario. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 15:09:58 UTC