- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:54:52 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068 --- Comment #8 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2010-07-07 13:54:52 --- I think the objection to "deprecated" is that it implies that support will be removed in a future version. Practically speaking, we can't drop support for any feature once it's widely used on the web, so this is misleading. In the terminology that HTML5 currently uses, you could ask that noscript be non-conforming, or be conforming but raise a validator warning. "Obsolete but conforming" is a subset of the latter, and isn't necessarily what you want (is it really obsolete, or we just think it's a bad idea?). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 13:54:55 UTC