- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:36:43 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068 --- Comment #7 from Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com> 2010-07-07 08:36:42 --- Not only is progressive enhancement a much better technique for dealing with cases where scripts are not supported in the client, it also caters for the case where the browser does support scripting, but all scripts are removed by a proxy server. In some secure environments, such as banks, scripts are removed from pages by a proxy server. In this scenario, the browser supports scripting, so the noscript content is not displayed. Not relying on noscript avoids this. I can't think of a good use case for keeping noscript. I didn't realise that deprecated was a term to be avoided, but I'm happy with "Obsolete, but conforming". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 08:36:44 UTC