- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:39:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10069
Summary: Structured clone algorithm should throw something more
informative than NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: jonas@sicking.cc
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Currently the structured clone algorithm throws a NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR error when
the cloning fails (for example due to the cloned object containing host
objects). This is a fairly generic and uninformative error.
One problem is that this makes it hard to defer to the HTML5 spec for other
specs that are using structured clones. For example IndexedDB uses the
structured clone algorithm for the IDBObjectStore.add method. However if all
that is thrown if a "uncloneable" is passed to IDBObjectStore.add is
NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR, then that gives the author very little information about
what went wrong.
I propose we instead throw a DATA_CLONE_ERR error, or some such.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 20:39:30 UTC